WB Planning

If you want to comment about the Council planning proposal and give your views, you might consider the following contacts:

email to:
Council: Planning Application
planningapplications@wandsworth.gov.uk

Tel: (020) 8871 8413

or write to:
Planning Service – Technical Service Department
Town Hall
Wandsworth High Street
London SW18 2PU

Please also contact/email and let them know your concerns:

You may want to send you letter to the press:

11 Comments Add your own

  • 1. Lynda Mathewson  |  December 15, 2008 at 12:43 pm

    I have emailed all the names on your list, giving all my concerns about density of people, height of the towers, insufficient expansion of the station to accommodate the next 20 years growth, concern over insufficient sewerage and drainage (following extensive flooding last summer), and inadequate school/hospital/transport/road provision (particularly since Ram Brewery Twin Towers development has been approved, and councillors are already discussing expansion of existing primary schools)

    I will be attending the planning meeting, and hope to register to speak/object.

    Great website,

    Lynda Mathewson

  • 2. Tamasine Pritchard  |  January 4, 2009 at 8:02 pm

    Knowing already the pressure the appartment blocks in Wandsworth near the roundabout have put on transport and drainage etc, as well as the ones at Imperial Wharf it is irresponsible to approve yet another badly thought out project.

    I would very much like to see the area redeveloped, but not if it means even more conjestion. Clapham Junction Station is dangerous at peak times already. St John’s Hill is dangerous with speeding traffic, busses and pedestrians.

    More thought and care needs to be considered.

  • 3. Rob Smith  |  January 31, 2009 at 12:43 pm

    We received a PR brochure on the proposed development this week from Quattro PR and couldn’t believe quite how ugly and intrusive the towers look. One of the photographs, showing a typical street with the towers “towering” over it, looks like it should be captioned something like “previous planning errors still blight the area”. Incredible.

  • 4. Cyril Richert  |  January 31, 2009 at 1:08 pm

    Rob> The interesting thing about the PR brochure is that within 9 photographs, only 3 are showing towers with only 1 (view from Severus road) giving maybe a good feeling of what it would look like (albeit showing only 1 tower properly). There are some interesting Q/A in the brochure and we intend to list and comment on the website next week.

  • 5. Julia Matcham  |  February 4, 2009 at 1:07 pm

    Is there any way of seeing the brochure on line? Evidently they think those further up Northcote Rd than Salcott Rd are not going to worry! I did look but couldn’t find.

  • 6. Cyril Richert  |  February 4, 2009 at 1:47 pm

    Julia Matcham>I have it here, I need to scan it and comment all the paragraphs + add a few comments that residents sent to me. I will do that probably on Thursday (I have at least 10 important emails to reply to but I’m currently scuba diving for work ;-) ). In the meantime, I hope to be able to put the video of the public meeting of last Wednesday on the website tonight or tomorrow.

  • 7. D  |  March 12, 2009 at 2:56 pm

    For the record, George Soros (the “Philanthropist”) owns near enough 50% of Delancey (which is run by Ritblatt and Son).

    By Jon Laycock
    Feb. 27 (Bloomberg) — Billionaire investor George Soros
    plans to invest 2 billion pounds ($3.8 billion) in the commercial
    property market in London, the Observer reported, without saying
    where it got the information.
    Soros has spent 300 million pounds on two office developments
    in London over the last few months through U.K. real estate
    company Delancey Estates Plc, the paper said.
    Demand for U.K. commercial property remains strong,
    attracting investors from around the world, the Observer said,
    citing unidentified property consultants.

    (Observer – Business, p. 2)

    For the Observer’s Web Site See TGDN

    –Editor: Z. Smith

    Story illustration: See DYE LN DES for more

  • 8. Peter Light  |  May 10, 2009 at 12:26 pm

    Sirs

    I fully support the proposed planned redevelopment of Clapham Junction as submitted.

    The area is of little or no merit as it stands. It is down at heal and a pedestrian the traffic disaster. It needs massive re-investment which I doubt the Council can/will undertake.

    The developer’s scheme may well be its last chance before it falls into further negligence and urban decay.

    I for one cannot abide the nay say’ers whom it appears wish things to stay as they are and are content to be surrounded by the current squalor of the area.

  • 9. Jerry Chater  |  May 11, 2009 at 8:44 am

    I agree with one aspect of Peter Light’s comment in that the site could do with development but add my concerns about the design of the towers.

    I do not believe it is necessary in this day and age to build in this manner.

    Local planning should be focussed on creating a forward looking and dynamic environment but not one that is ugly and oppressive.

    We do not want our local surroundings dominated by an eyesore straight out of some 60′s vision of dystopia.

    I do not believe the argument that these towers are necessary to fund the development.

    In respect to the postcard campaign by the developers which according to them generated support from ‘hundreds of people from Wandsworth and across London’ – These postcards were visually focussed on the shopping centre/ access area of the development and carried a picture of the towers which was totally misleading of their size and aspect. I would say this was a blatant ‘trick’ and I’m sure that the majority of people were unaware of this when signing their support.

  • 10. Joanna Downer  |  May 15, 2009 at 2:01 pm

    I received a very misleading postcard through my door this week from the developers designed to be sent to the planners in support of the tower blocks.
    Firstly, I can’t believe such a crazy plan could be seriously considered in an area where even the smallest loft extension has to be in-keeping and appropriate. The towers are completely alien to the feel of the area and extremely dominant and ugly.
    Secondly, the postcard, ad in the Wandsworth Guardian today and developers’ website all gloss over the appearance of the towers by not showing the scale and height in photos. The advert in the paper hardly mentioned the towers at all, concentrating on a “now or never” chance to improve Clapham Junction station and also saying the area is in decline (which seems an odd thing to say with new shops like Waitrose and Jamie Oliver just moving to St John’s Road).
    It frankly feels like a manipulative propaganda campaign by the developers. A massive eyesore shouldn’t be created for this part of London because of “support” based on distorted facts and statistics produced by a massive media/ PR campaign in favour of the towers.

  • 11. Julia Matcham  |  May 15, 2009 at 6:04 pm

    Joanna please do copy all of that to the Councils limp request for comments on:

    http://www.wandsworth.gov.uk/Home/MyWandsworth/Pressreleases/newspage_detail.htm?id=6380

    They don’t even mention the 42 storey towers…just make it look like any old modern boring shopping centre. One could be forgiven for thinking the Council was selling it to us…although they are constanly talking about not predjudicing the outcome!!!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: