Planning: HiQ Tyreservices – Chatham Road

August 24, 2009 at 10:49 am 4 comments

Author: Julia Matcham

Tyre Services-photoThe Council has published the documents for redevelopment of the site called “HiQ Tyreservices” (76 – 80 Chatham Road SW11, off Northcote Road) involving demolition of existing commercial building and construction of 9 residential units, 4 with internal garages and three additional off street parking spaces and cycle parking and 1 retail unit (use class A1).

The loss of HiQ TYRESERVICES in Chatham Road will be another nail in the coffin of a coherent local community with local facilities.

This development is puny in comparison with the giant blocks we have been fighting against at Clapham Junction but still important. ‘HiQ Tyreservices’, is described by the applicants on the Council’s website as a ‘tyre warehouse’. In fact it is a large garage that does repairs and MOTs. It occupies a big ground area and it is not surprising that the owner of the site (the garage is leasehold) has put in a planning application for redeveloping the site, something the manager of the garage only found out about when he saw the yellow notice posted on the opposite lamppost !

I guess it is impossible to stop developers seeing every large space they set their sights on as a potential row of houses and a pot of gold, regardless of the usefulness of the business currently standing on it. It is money asking to be made. Buy the site, buy the lease. develop, sell … bank the money! Why don’t we all do it!

The loss of a garage will be a serious blow to many local residents as there are fewer and fewer such facilities in the area.

While it is impossible to stop such behaviour, the Council is in a position to make the incentive less remunerative than the developers would like. It could be that the sale of the garage lease to the site owner is not a done-deal and depends on how much money the developer stands to make IF given planning permission.

The application is for 9 residential units AND a shop. 5×3 bed plus 4×2 bed units.

The way the houses (units) are crammed in is a credit to the architect’s ingenuity.

The proposal seems to me, and I hope will seem so to the Council, a preposterous overdevelopment. The façade of Tyreservices is three houses wide, but the ground area at the back is big (absolutely ideal for a local garage!).

Tyre Services  - elevationClick on the image to see it bigger

The planned units in a long row at the back seem to be based on the minimum legal requirement for the size of rooms, although the plans are not clear re- this. There are no gardens.

Tyre Services 9 res unitsThe total of 7 parking spaces proposed (3 outside and 4 inside) are not likely to represent the needs of approx 23 new residents plus whatever needs the retail shop may generate.

Hopefully the Council will reject this application.

Anyone similarly minded please email : boroughplanner@wandsworth.gov.uk (more details HERE) re – application 2009/2518 as soon as possible.

Advertisements

Entry filed under: Clapham Junction.

Tileman scheme rejected: too high Justine Greening’s view on planning: involve local communities

4 Comments

  • 1. John Hooper  |  August 25, 2009 at 10:48 am

    I have used HiQ Tyre services for many years and if it closes I shall have to look for other facilities farther afield. This is a very popular local service.
    I also obect to the principle of cramming additional residential space into every available plot in the Northcote area. We will gradually squeeze out the commercial premises wich make this such a varied and rewarding area to live in. There has already been a huge inroad on the mixed domestic shopping premises that are available.

  • 2. Mrs Anderson  |  August 25, 2009 at 11:07 am

    It will be another great loss to the community to lose HQ tyre Services for yet another ‘infill’ project in this area. Offering 4 garages to the site will take 4 cars off roadside parking but with the number of houses being proposed by the developers there is potential for far more than 3 cars parking on our streets which will no doubt bounce into Bramfield Road etc. We were assured by the Council when another development off Chatham Road was built that garages would be provided for the five houses built and that the occupiers cars would be kept in them. None of these garages are used to house their cars consequently it looks like a car park, the outside garage is used for their refuse collections. I feel very strongly that more consideration should be taken to ensure that the shopping facilities and parking availability should be taken into more account when planning permission for a development of this size is requested.

  • 3. mike snaith  |  September 2, 2009 at 10:02 pm

    The council won’t worry as they can just sell more overpriced parking permits which, of course, never guarantee you a parking space on the street. The other sadness is that yet another useful and long-standing community service will disappear.

  • 4. Judith Howard  |  September 7, 2009 at 2:07 pm

    I am dismayed to see the proposals to replace the useful Chatham Road garage with yet more residential units, and agree with all the previous comments. I don’t have a car, but have used the garage for other metal repair work, and was planning to do so again in future!
    It is amazing that the landlord apparently did not let the garage tenant know of his proposals – the arrogance defies belief!

    Any new units MUST have their own parking (I was very annoyed at the Council passing the development at the bottom of Bramfield Road without insisting on this – the basements were dug out for storage, but could have housed underground parking spaces).

    I agree also with the comment about the size of rooms in the proposed new units. I have read that here in the UK we have the smallest permitted rooms sizes in the E.U., and I have certainly seen very tiny sitting rooms in some new flats in the area. Surveys have shown that it is very stressful living in cramped quarters, and produces aggression (even too many animals in a cage begin to fight each other!). Our UK building regulations should be amended to give a larger minimum size.

    In this respect, I was sorry to see that the Estate Agents (Thoroughgood) at the corner of Bramfield and 140 Northcote are persisting with their plans to build a 2-storey property on their tiny car park (Planning Application no. 2009/1729). Seeing the ground area involved, this would also mean extremely tiny rooms. I spoke to Austin Thoroughgood about this, and he replied that “no-one has to come and live in them”!!! – hardly an adequate response in my opinion! I pointed out that if such properties are all that are available or affordable in this area, people have little option. I still think it is quite unacceptable to build something so cramped that you would not be willing to live in it yourself. Also, of course, the position of the new building would cut out sunlight from the gardens and first floor roof terraces along that section of Northcote road, but there again I met with a “couldn’t care less” type of response (and a complaint about the bad press which Estate Agents always seemed to get – which I found somewhat ironic in the circumstances!!!).

    How very sad that the sight of money blinds people to all other moral considerations…..


August 2009
M T W T F S S
« Jul   Sep »
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31  

Categories

Feeds


%d bloggers like this: